Nomos Engine answers Texas legal questions from the statutes and opinions themselves — and refuses to answer when it can't ground the claim in a verbatim quote. Matter management, client files, and deposition transcripts included.
Courts have begun sanctioning filings built on fabricated citations, and Texas district courts — Denton among them — now require filers to certify that AI-assisted content was checked by a human. Nomos Engine is built so that certification is something you can actually make.
Drafting and verification are separate steps. Whatever proposes an answer, a deterministic verifier decides what you're allowed to see. It binds every claim to a specific piece of authority and confirms the quoted language appears in that authority exactly.
Questions about another state's law are declined rather than answered from Texas material.
Nomos Engine is a practice system, not a search box. Everything below is part of the product, not a separate purchase.
Statutes, court opinions, and Attorney General opinions, answered with verified citations, official source links, and the controlling authority first.
Move from the statute to the sections citing it, then to its legislative history, then to the court and judge you're actually in front of.
Record or upload, and get a timestamped transcript and a quote-grounded summary. Transcription runs locally — audio isn't shipped to a third party.
Per-matter folders with drag-and-drop intake. Documents are encrypted at rest and exportable as a complete case file whenever you want them.
Style of case, signature block, certificate of service, and per-court formatting rules applied to the document you file.
Capture time against the matter you're already working in, and bill from it — without a second subscription.
We cover Texas law thoroughly rather than fifty states shallowly, and the price reflects that. Per attorney, billed annually. Staff and paralegal seats are free.
No. Texas statutes, Texas court opinions, and Texas Attorney General opinions. Ask it about another state's law and it declines rather than answering from Texas material. That's a deliberate limit, and it's why the price is what it is.
A claim only publishes if its quoted language appears verbatim in the authority it cites. Anything that fails that check is dropped before you see it, and an answer with nothing left becomes an abstention. This is a structural check, not a prompt asking a model to behave.
You do. Client documents are encrypted at rest and stay with your practice rather than being pooled into a vendor-run database — a deliberate decision about custodial risk. You can export a complete case file at any time.
Neither. It's a research and drafting tool. You remain responsible for reviewing every authority it surfaces and every document you file, including under any court order requiring certification of AI-assisted work.
No. They are rough, AI-generated drafts, clearly marked as such on every page and export. Where a certified transcript is required, you still need a certified reporter.